One of the first advertisers to pull out was a luxury car brand, whose spokesperson lamented, “When we signed up to sponsor the debate, we didn’t realize it would turn into a live fact-checking extravaganza. We expected a classy, uninterrupted political brawl, not a ‘Gotcha!’ fest.”
Soon after, a major fast-food chain followed suit, saying, “Look, we’re all for informed voting, but our customers don’t come to ABC for facts. They come for spectacle. Our customers want to enjoy their burgers and fries without the uncomfortable side dish of reality-checking.”
And so, one by one, major advertisers jumped ship, leaving ABC’s finance department scrambling to figure out how they lost $27 million faster than Trump could shout “fake news!”
The debate, while a ratings hit, quickly became a nightmare for the network’s marketing team. It wasn’t just about the fact-checking—it was the entire atmosphere. The moderators, despite their best efforts, had managed to alienate everyone. Trump supporters accused them of bias, Harris fans complained they were too soft, and even the ABC fact-checkers themselves reportedly filed grievances, claiming they were overworked and underappreciated.
But the real blow came when the advertisers—those sweet, moneybags sponsors—decided they’d had enough.
CONTINUE READING ON THE NEXT PAGE
Advertisement:
Banana Wonders: Age-Old Secrets for Youthful Skin
Classic Grilled Cheese and Tomato Soup Recipe
How To Make Beef And Cheese Chimichanga
Primanti Br0s. L0ses 3 Maj0r Sp0ns0rs After J.D. Vance Fall0ut
Mother-In-Law Wants Paid For Babysitting Grandchild
Removing Hard Water Stains from a Toilet Bowl
Discover the Joys of Garlic Roasted Eggplants: A Simple and Delicious Recipe
Egg Cartons:the Fight Against Mosquitoes
A Clever Hack with Clothespins and the Heating Grid
