While suing for media bias is far from new in today’s political climate, a $1 billion lawsuit sets a bold precedent. Many legal experts are scratching their heads, wondering if Vance’s case has legs. “Suing for $1 billion over biased moderators? That’s a tall order,” said legal analyst Nancy Wilkins. “If politicians could sue over hurt feelings every time a moderator fact-checked them, we’d have a new court case every day.

But Giuliani, who has never shied away from taking on improbable cases, says this one’s a slam dunk. “Look, the First Amendment doesn’t protect media bias,” he stated confidently. “This was supposed to be an even playing field, but CBS tilted the scales in favor of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. We’re going to prove that J.D. Vance was denied his constitutional right to a fair debate. And we’re going to do it for $1 billion.”

The lawsuit demands restitution for “emotional distress” and “reputation damage,” as Vance claims that the moderators’ actions harmed his standing with voters who might have otherwise been swayed by his charm and pro-Trump policies. Giuliani believes that the lawsuit will not only expose media bias but also send a message to all networks: “Don’t mess with Vance, or you’ll pay for it—literally.”

As expected, the reaction to Vance’s lawsuit has been as divided as the nation itself. Supporters of the Ohio senator took to social media to applaud his bold move, with many echoing his claims of “fake news” and media manipulation. “Finally, someone’s standing up to these liberal media bullies!” wrote one Twitter user. “They’ve been getting away with this for too long.”

CONTINUE READING ON THE NEXT PAGE

Advertisement: